Trump has swiftly aligned himself with Biden’s peace agreement between Hamas and Israel, likely aiming to claim credit for achieving peace even before his potential inauguration. This political move appears calculated to showcase his effectiveness to voters, but the same approach cannot and should not be applied to Ukraine.
The Russo-Ukrainian war is vastly different from other conflicts, as it directly impacts transatlantic security. This is a war of national survival, with the entire Ukrainian population resisting Russia’s aggression while facing attempts at systematic erasure from the map. Despite Russia’s ongoing efforts to destroy Ukraine, the country has demonstrated remarkable resilience. Ukraine has managed to sustain its winter energy supply without blackouts, achieve 4% economic growth even during full-scale war, and limit Russian gains to costly, attritional advances in the east. Meanwhile, Russia’s economy is faltering, and its battlefield losses remain immense.
The scale of this war means that Trump must recognise there are no quick solutions. Supporting Ukraine is a strategic necessity for the United States and cannot become “Trump’s Afghanistan.” If he caves to Russian pressure and pushes for an unfavourable peace deal, it will embolden other authoritarian regimes, including North Korea, Iran, and China. Such a move could invite challenges to American interests in key regions such as the Arctic and the South China Sea. A weak response in Ukraine could lead to irreparable damage to US global leadership.
Instead, Trump has an opportunity to project strength by supporting Ukraine more decisively than Biden or even his own previous administration. This war remains winnable—provided that restrictions on military support are lifted, and Ukraine receives comprehensive assistance to defeat Russia. Moscow can be forced into a decisive loss, which would serve as a defining victory for Trump, bolstering America’s global influence and demonstrating unwavering strength.
Ukraine offers more than just a strategic military advantage. It holds significant potential as a long-term ally to the United States, with its vast reserves of critical minerals and an increasingly advanced defence industry. By bolstering Ukraine’s economic and military development, the US can help transform it into a vital security partner that stabilises European borders and reinforces transatlantic alliances. Such an approach would not only ensure global stability but also cement America’s leadership on the world stage.
Supporting Ukraine is not just a matter of morality—it is a calculated investment in America’s future power and security. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has already outlined a victory plan for Trump, consisting of four key elements. These include NATO membership for Ukraine, long-term security guarantees post-war, protection of Ukrainian natural resources, and economic cooperation to attract international investment and ensure lasting peace.
The military component of Ukraine’s victory plan, though not entirely public, is known to include advanced long-range strike capabilities. Ukraine has already been using its own weapons to strike deep into Russian territory, targeting ammunition depots, military production facilities, and strategic bases. Expanding these efforts with additional American long-range weapons would further cripple Russia’s ability to wage war. Air superiority is another crucial aspect, requiring more air defence systems, fighter jets, and advanced early detection platforms, which have been promised but not yet delivered.
All of this is achievable if the United States is willing to move past self-imposed restrictions and artificial deterrence measures. The ongoing Ukrainian offensive in Kursk demonstrates why this war is far from over. With Trump’s inauguration approaching, Russia has failed to reclaim Kursk, even with reinforcements from North Korean troops. This vulnerability underscores why a Ukrainian victory is not only possible but increasingly within reach.
Trump’s Strategy on Ukraine Could Define His Presidency
Trump has swiftly aligned himself with Biden’s peace agreement between Hamas and Israel, likely aiming to claim credit for achieving peace even before his potential inauguration. This political move appears calculated to showcase his effectiveness to voters, but the same approach cannot and should not be applied to Ukraine.
The Russo-Ukrainian war is vastly different from other conflicts, as it directly impacts transatlantic security. This is a war of national survival, with the entire Ukrainian population resisting Russia’s aggression while facing attempts at systematic erasure from the map. Despite Russia’s ongoing efforts to destroy Ukraine, the country has demonstrated remarkable resilience. Ukraine has managed to sustain its winter energy supply without blackouts, achieve 4% economic growth even during full-scale war, and limit Russian gains to costly, attritional advances in the east. Meanwhile, Russia’s economy is faltering, and its battlefield losses remain immense.
The scale of this war means that Trump must recognise there are no quick solutions. Supporting Ukraine is a strategic necessity for the United States and cannot become “Trump’s Afghanistan.” If he caves to Russian pressure and pushes for an unfavourable peace deal, it will embolden other authoritarian regimes, including North Korea, Iran, and China. Such a move could invite challenges to American interests in key regions such as the Arctic and the South China Sea. A weak response in Ukraine could lead to irreparable damage to US global leadership.
Instead, Trump has an opportunity to project strength by supporting Ukraine more decisively than Biden or even his own previous administration. This war remains winnable—provided that restrictions on military support are lifted, and Ukraine receives comprehensive assistance to defeat Russia. Moscow can be forced into a decisive loss, which would serve as a defining victory for Trump, bolstering America’s global influence and demonstrating unwavering strength.
Ukraine offers more than just a strategic military advantage. It holds significant potential as a long-term ally to the United States, with its vast reserves of critical minerals and an increasingly advanced defence industry. By bolstering Ukraine’s economic and military development, the US can help transform it into a vital security partner that stabilises European borders and reinforces transatlantic alliances. Such an approach would not only ensure global stability but also cement America’s leadership on the world stage.
Supporting Ukraine is not just a matter of morality—it is a calculated investment in America’s future power and security. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has already outlined a victory plan for Trump, consisting of four key elements. These include NATO membership for Ukraine, long-term security guarantees post-war, protection of Ukrainian natural resources, and economic cooperation to attract international investment and ensure lasting peace.
The military component of Ukraine’s victory plan, though not entirely public, is known to include advanced long-range strike capabilities. Ukraine has already been using its own weapons to strike deep into Russian territory, targeting ammunition depots, military production facilities, and strategic bases. Expanding these efforts with additional American long-range weapons would further cripple Russia’s ability to wage war. Air superiority is another crucial aspect, requiring more air defence systems, fighter jets, and advanced early detection platforms, which have been promised but not yet delivered.
All of this is achievable if the United States is willing to move past self-imposed restrictions and artificial deterrence measures. The ongoing Ukrainian offensive in Kursk demonstrates why this war is far from over. With Trump’s inauguration approaching, Russia has failed to reclaim Kursk, even with reinforcements from North Korean troops. This vulnerability underscores why a Ukrainian victory is not only possible but increasingly within reach.
Related posts:
Orbán urges EU to rethink Ukraine aid strategy following Trump’s election victory
Russia’s Medvedev says a Trump presidency would be a blow to Ukraine
Trump Advisors Propose Strategy to Halt Ukrainian Military Aid for Peace Talks with Russia